Punishment for racism in Australia. Racism in Australia - How Race Attitudes Are Changing with Coming to Australia! Immigration to Australia will be much worse

Racist riots in Australia in 2005

Racist riots in the Sydney area began with an incident that took place on December 4, 2005 on one of the beaches in Cronalle. On the beach, a conflict arose between lifeguards and a group of young people of Middle Eastern origin who were playing football, disturbing other vacationers. The players did not respond to the suggestion to look for another place to play. After that, a group of rescuers was attacked by people of Arab appearance.

Over the next week, SMS messages began to circulate in Australia calling for a rebuff to people from the Middle East. The action was scheduled for December 11, 2005. It should be noted that the local police recorded incidents related to ethnic strife since October 2005. The media reported that tensions between the local community and Lebanese immigrants had already existed before this event. Many women claimed to have been harassed by Lebanese men.

Sociologists note that in Sydney, immigrant communities from Muslim countries have formed closed communities, their children receive poor education and cannot find work. Ethnic gangs began to appear, which are credited with killing white Australians. In November 2005, the secret services announced the disclosure of a terrorist plot, 18 people of Arab origin were arrested, who were accused of plotting a terrorist attack in New South Wales. All this has become a breeding ground for the emergence of extremist sentiments among both white and immigrant youth.

An initially peaceful crowd of around 5,000 gathered on December 11, 2005 to protest the violence against local residents. However, neo-Nazis were seen in the assembled crowd, wearing T-shirts with the words "Immigrant Free Zone", "Proud to be Australian", "Ethnic Cleansing Unit" and so on. The crowd ceased to be peaceful when a man of Arab appearance appeared.

He was surrounded and driven into the lobby of a nearby hotel. People chanted the slogan "Lebanese, get out of here!". The intervention of the police only angered the crowd. Calls for violence were also shouted out by people heated by alcohol. Two teenagers from Bangladesh were pelted with bottles.

During the same day, there were several more attacks on people of Middle Eastern origin, and at the same time on police officers and ambulance workers. They were thrown bottles and beaten. 26 people sought medical attention for cuts and bruises.

In response, young people from Sydney's immigrant areas began beating passers-by, breaking cars and glass in stores using baseball bats, iron bars and knives. Some had their pistols confiscated. Street clashes began between white and colored Australians. As a result, about 30 people were injured, many very seriously, 16 people were arrested.

On December 12, 2005, the pogroms continued. The media reported dozens of victims, burned cars and vandalized shops. More than 30 Molotov cocktails were confiscated by the police.

On December 13, racial unrest began in other parts of the country. In the state of Queensland, SMS messages were sent out in which white Australians were encouraged to beat immigrants. An Arab family was attacked in Perth. In Adelaide, taxi passengers beat a Lebanese driver. Stones were thrown at the premises of the Islamic Council in Melbourne.

The Australian Parliament urgently gave the police additional powers, including the right to block traffic, search suspicious persons, confiscate cars. Emergency measures were taken, which included the organization of closed zones, the closure of establishments, a ban on the sale of alcohol, an increase in criminal liability for participation in riots up to 15 years, etc.

A police operation was carried out in Sydney, involving 800 police officers. In total, about 100 people were arrested.

In July 2006, police filed charges against 104 people, including charges of intentional damage, use of prohibited weapons, assault on police, resisting arrest, violence and fighting.

Australian Prime Minister J. Howard condemned the instigators, but refused to call the rioters racists. Politicians and leaders of religious and ethnic communities assessed the causes of the unrest in different ways. Some believe that the unrest is criminally motivated, while others see inter-ethnic hidden contradictions in the conflict.

Popular youth groups of surfers and bikers, which include both white Australians and Lebanese, condemned ethnic hatred. They stressed that racism has no place in Australia.

Human Design - Human Design - a voluminous field of sciences about the uniqueness of man and life in the world

All UEFA football team logos European countries on www.LogoFC.Info

What I didn't expect to see in Australia is racism. Moreover, practically uncovered, and which 50 years ago was completely legalized at the state level.
To be honest, I saw my post about the natives in a completely different way, but when I started to google the topic, I was simply amazed at what the British were doing in relation to the local population.
Yes, of course, if you look at the appearance of the Australian Aborigines, you will find little attractiveness in it. I admit that in communication they are not at all cute, but ... do not shoot them for this, like monkeys.
Namely, as monkeys or wild dogs, they were shot for more than 200 years by all and sundry across the continent. Completely legal.
That's what it is, dual democracy.
Read the whole tin under the cut.

In Perth, I saw very few natives, literally a few, but in the outback of the Wild West there are a lot of them on the streets. And they look, to put it mildly, not very much, somewhat reminiscent of our gypsies ...
In communicating with the Australians here and there, extreme hostility towards the natives slips: "If you fail to send the child to a paid school, you will have to study in the same school with the natives", "You should not stop by that town, there are only natives on the streets", " See a native in a store, wait for him to come out before going in" and stuff like that.
But what did they do with them in the century before last and the last...

Here is one article that caught my eye while searching for materials about Aboriginal people. I will not rewrite it, I will give it almost entirely.

Australia was supposedly inhabited between 40,000 and 50,000 years ago. The oldest human remains on the continent, the so-called Mungo Man, are about 40 thousand years old. Estimates of the population at the end of the 18th century, before the beginning of colonization, give between 315 and 750 thousand people. This population was divided into about 250 peoples, many of which were in alliances with each other. Each people spoke their own language, and some even several languages, so there were more than 250 Australian Aboriginal languages. About two hundred of these languages ​​are now extinct.

In 1770, the British expedition of James Cook on the ship Endeavor explored and charted the east coast of Australia, first landing on April 29 in Botany Bay.

On January 26, 1788, Captain Arthur Phillip founded the settlement of Sydney Cove, which later became the city of Sydney. This event marked the beginning of the history of the British colony of New South Wales, and Phillip's landing day is celebrated in Australia as a national holiday, Australia Day. The colony included not only Australia, but also New Zealand. Settlement of Van Diemen's Land, now known as Tasmania, began in 1803 and became a separate colony in 1825.
In 1829, the Swan River Colony was founded, which became the core of the future state of Western Australia. Western Australia was founded as a free colony, but then, due to an acute shortage of labor, also began to accept convicts. The sending of convicts to Australia began to decline in 1840 and ceased completely by 1868.

Colonization was accompanied by the founding and expansion of settlements across the continent. So, at this time, Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane were founded. Large areas were cleared of forest and shrubs and began to be used for agricultural purposes. This had a serious impact on the way of life of the Australian Aborigines and forced them to retreat from the coasts.
British settlers in Australia, and especially in Tasmania, for their own prosperity, systematically destroyed the indigenous population and undermined the foundations of their lives - in other words, they conquered their living space. The Australian aborigines were presented to the "higher English race" as nothing more than a variety of monkeys.

“Europeans can hope to prosper, because ... the blacks will soon disappear ... If the natives are shot in the same way as crows are shot in some countries, then the number of the native population should be greatly reduced over time,” wrote Robert Knox in his “philosophical study on the influence of race” .
Alan Moorehead described the fatal changes that befell Australia in this way: “In Sydney, the wild tribes were washed out. In Tasmania they were exterminated to a man... by settlers... and convicts... they were all hungry for land, and none of them was going to let the blacks stop it. However, those gentle and kind-hearted people whom Cook had visited half a century before were not as submissive as on the mainland.

After the farmers took away the land from the indigenous people (primarily in Tasmania, where the climate was colder), the natives with spears in their hands tried to resist the newcomers armed with firearms. In response, the British organized a real hunt for them - a kind of safari, combining "useful with pleasant".
In Tasmania, the hunting of black people took place with the sanction of the British authorities: “The final extermination on a large scale could only be carried out with the help of justice and the armed forces ... The soldiers of the fortieth regiment drove the natives between two boulders, shot all the men, and then pulled out the women and children out of rock crevices to blow their brains out." (Alan Moorehead, The Fatal Impact: An Account of the Invasion of the South Pacific, 1767-1840)

If the natives were intractable and resisted, the British concluded that the only way out of the situation was to exterminate them. Those who could be caught were taken away. In 1835, the last surviving local resident was taken out. Moreover, these measures were not secret, no one was ashamed of them, and the government supported this policy.

“So, the hunt for people began, and over time it became more and more cruel. In 1830, Tasmania was placed under martial law; a chain of armed men was lined up all over the island, who tried to drive the natives into a trap. The natives managed to get through the cordon, but the will to live left the hearts of the savages, fear was stronger than despair ... ”- this is how Felix Maynard, the doctor of the French whaling ship, recalled the systematic raids on the natives.
“The Tasmanians were useless and all died,” said Hammond John Lawrence Le Breton, a British historian and journalist.

During the genocide, Charles Darwin visited Tasmania. He wrote: "I'm afraid there is no doubt that the evil that is happening here, and its consequences, is the result of the shameless behavior of some of our countrymen." This is putting it mildly. It was a heinous, unforgivable crime...
“The natives had only two alternatives: either resist and die, or submit and become a parody of themselves,” wrote Alan Moorehead.

The Polish traveler Count Strzelecki, who visited Australia in the late 1830s, was horrified by what he saw: “Humiliated, depressed, confused ... emaciated and covered with dirty rags, they are the natural owners of this land - now they are more ghosts of the past than living people; they vegetate here in their melancholy existence, waiting for an even more melancholy end.” Strzelecki also mentioned "the examination by one race of the corpse of another - with the verdict: "She died overtaken by the punishment of God." The extermination of the natives could be regarded as hunting, as a sport, because they seemed to have no soul. Similarly, the descendants of the British acted on another mainland - North America, exterminating the Indians and justifying themselves by the fact that they (the Indians) allegedly have no soul. So, we can conclude that such predatory behavior and racism is characteristic of all Anglo-Saxons and is an integral part of their worldview.

True, Christian missionaries opposed the notions of the “lack of soul” among the “natives” and saved the lives of a considerable number of the last indigenous inhabitants of Australia. Nevertheless, the constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia, which was in force already in the post-war years, ordered (section 127) "not to take into account the natives" when calculating the population of individual states. Thus, at the constitutional level, the aborigines were declared not to be people. After all, back in 1865, Europeans, when confronted with natives, were not sure whether they were dealing with "intelligent monkeys or very lowly developed people."

Caring for "these beastmen" is "a crime against our own blood," Heinrich Himmler, the spiritual heir of the Anglo-Saxons, recalled in 1943, speaking of the Russians, who should have been subjugated to the Nordic master race.
The British, who were doing "unheard of things in colonization" in Australia (in the words of Adolf Hitler), did not need this kind of instruction. Так, одно сообщение за 1885 г. гласит: «Чтобы успокоить ниггеров, им дали нечто потрясающее. The food that was handed out to them was half strychnine - and no one escaped his fate ... The owner of Long Lagun, with the help of this trick, destroyed more than a hundred blacks. “In the old days in New South Wales, it was useless to get those who invited blacks over and gave them poisoned meat the punishment they deserved.” (Janine Roberts, S. 30; Hirst & Murray & Hammond, Liberalism and Empire (London, 1900))

Некий Винсент Лесина еще в 1901 г. заявил в австралийском парламенте: «Ниггер должен исчезнуть с пути развития белого человека» - так «гласит закон эволюции».
We did not realize that by killing blacks we were breaking the law ... because it used to be practiced everywhere, ”this was the main argument of the British, who killed twenty-eight“ friendly ”(i.e. peaceful) natives in 1838. Prior to this massacre on Myell Creek, all actions to exterminate the indigenous inhabitants of Australia went unpunished. Only in the second year of the reign of Queen Victoria for such a crime, as an exception, seven Englishmen (from the lower strata) were hanged.

Nevertheless, in Queensland (northern Australia) at the end of the 19th century. An innocent fun was considered to drive a whole family of “nigers” - husband, wife and children - into the water to crocodiles ... During his stay in North Queensland in 1880–1884, the Norwegian Karl Lumholz heard the following statements: “You can only shoot blacks - like it - no one else can deal with them." One of the colonists remarked that this was a "hard ... but ... necessary principle." He himself shot all the men he met on his pastures, “because they are cattle-killers, women - because they give birth to cattle-killers, and children - because they will be cattle-killers. They do not want to work and therefore are not good for anything but to get a bullet, ”the colonists complained to Lumholtz.

Among the Anglo-Australian farmers, the trade in native women flourished, and the English settlers hunted them in droves. One government report from 1900 notes that "these women were passed from farmer to farmer" until "they were eventually thrown out like rubbish, left to rot from venereal diseases." [H. Reynolds, Other side of Frontier, p. 17; Janine Roberts, Nach Volkermord Landraub, S. 33.]

The government considered intermarriage "degrading for an English man, although these men were almost always of the lowest birth." But the strongest argument against this kind of connection was the "birth of hybrids." Women should be "kept in complete isolation to prevent this evil". This position was given some scientism by the publication of books such as The Science of Man (1907), which "explained": such crosses usually degenerate and die out.
“The cattle farming project in northern Australia has for the first time created a serious threat to the existence of local tribes. To crush their resistance, punitive police expeditions slaughtered entire tribes,” Roberts wrote.

One of the last documented Aboriginal massacres in the Northwest took place in 1928. A missionary witnessed this massacre and decided to look into Aboriginal reports of incessant killings. He followed a police squad heading to the Forest River Aboriginal Reservation and saw that the policemen had captured an entire tribe. The prisoners were shackled, building the back of the head to the back of the head, and then all but three women were killed. After that, they burned the corpses, and took the women with them to the camp. Before leaving the camp, they also killed and burned these women.

The evidence collected by this missionary eventually led the authorities to open an investigation, which was carried out by a "Royal Commission into the Murder and Burning of Aborigines in the East Kimberley and the methods used by the police in their arrests" (1928. West Australian Parliamentary Papers. Vol. 1. P . 10.). However, the police officers responsible for the incident have never been brought to justice.
One Melbourne newspaper described the following statement as typical of that time: "If the government announced the hunting season for blacks tomorrow, I would be the first to apply for a license." Other "whites" "were in full solidarity with this statement." Аборигенов все еще называют «ниггерами» и «ублюдками». "Unlimited hatred is common here."

In another part of Australia, the following comment was made: Aboriginal people "under the black law within a 100-mile radius of Adelaide should be boxed and sent to government laboratories to be used in experiments instead of rats" - this statement was made by a municipal councilor from Port Adelaide in September 1977

In any case, in the XIX century. none of the London governments issued any special laws to protect the indigenous inhabitants of Australia - and did not even try to do so (unlike the Madrid government, which issued similar laws back in the 16th century, and the Muscovite - in the 17th century). And none of the British governments took it upon themselves to protect the natives, or even felt obliged to do so. Unless lone humanists listened to the rhetorical statements of the opposition (in particular, to the conclusions of the London Parliamentary Commission of Inquiry into the events of 1837, which reported "unprecedented atrocities." Separate indignant voices had no effect on the British colonists. After Australia received the status of self-governing dominion (1855), the indignant appeals of private humanist unions (once ridiculed by Thomas Carlyle and later attacked by British fascists) from the mother country finally ceased to oblige anyone to anything.(In fact, both the working class and the establishment perceived «Humanitarian League» как «протестантское занудство». Ибо как раз неквалифицированные европейцы, опасаясь конкуренции аборигенов, отказывались признавать равенство «ниггеров», в том числе и в Австралии.

Anglo-Saxon ill-skilled workers mocked the natives, thus asserting their racial "superiority". The British steward Richard Bligh tried unsuccessfully to protect the native women and children. In 1849 he reported on the atrocities committed by their murderers. После этого все английское колониальное сообщество отвернулось от него - так поступали с каждым, кто пытался защищать «ниггеров». As Kiernan wrote, protests from London were ignored by the colonists, and the gift of Australia in 1855-1856. autonomy put an end to them altogether. Then they hunted for skulls - for an exchange with wild tribes.

During the 20th century, Australia continued its policy of assimilation of the indigenous population: many Aboriginal children were forcibly given up for education in white families. It was not until 1967 that indigenous people received equal rights with whites, including the right to Australian citizenship. Today, Indigenous Australians are fighting unsuccessfully for official recognition by the Australian government of the fact of genocide.

BRITISH RACISM IN ACTION: AUSTRALIA'S GENOCIDE COLONIZATION

…Are we dealing with intelligent monkeys or very lowly developed people?

Oldfield, 1865

The only sane and logical solution to an inferior race is to destroy it.

H. J. Wells, 1902

British settlers in Australia, and especially in Tasmania, for their own prosperity, systematically destroyed the indigenous population and undermined the foundations of their lives. The British "needed" all the lands of the natives with favorable climatic conditions. "Europeans can hope for prosperity, because ... blacks will soon disappear ... If the natives are shot in the same way as crows are shot in some countries, then the [native] population should be greatly reduced over time," wrote Robert Knox in his "philosophical study on the influence race." Alan Moorehead described the fatal changes that befell Australia in this way: “In Sydney, the wild tribes were washed out. In Tasmania they were exterminated to a man... by settlers... and convicts... they were all hungry for land, and none of them was going to let the blacks stop it. However, those gentle and kind-hearted people whom Cook had visited half a century before were not as submissive as on the mainland. After the farmers took away the land from the indigenous people (primarily in Tasmania, where the climate was colder), the natives with spears in their hands tried to resist the newcomers armed with firearms. In response, the British organized a real hunt for them. In Tasmania, such a hunt for people took place with the sanction of the British authorities: “The final extermination on a large scale could only be carried out with the help of justice and the armed forces ... The soldiers of the fortieth regiment drove the natives between two boulders, shot all the men, and then pulled out the women and children from rocky clefts to knock out their brains" (1830). If the natives were "unkind [unaccommodating]", the British concluded that the only way out of the situation was to destroy them. The natives were "hunted incessantly, hunted down like fallow deer." Those who could be caught were taken away. In 1835, the last surviving local resident was taken out. Moreover, these measures were not secret, no one was ashamed of them, and the government supported this policy.

“So, the hunt for people began, and over time it became more and more cruel. In 1830, Tasmania was placed under martial law; a chain of armed men was lined up all over the island, who tried to drive the natives into a trap. The natives managed to get through the cordon, but the will to live left the hearts of the savages, fear was stronger than despair ... "Felix Maynard, the doctor of the French whaling ship, recalled the systematic raids on the natives. "The Tasmanians were useless and [now] all died," believed Hammond.

“During the Holocaust, Charles Darwin visited Tasmania. He wrote: "I'm afraid there is no doubt that the evil that is happening here, and its consequences, is the result of the shameless behavior of some of our countrymen." This is putting it mildly. It was a monstrous, unforgivable crime… The natives had only two alternatives: either resist and die, or submit and become a parody of themselves,” wrote Alan Moorhead. The Polish traveler Count Strzelecki, who arrived in Australia in the late 1830s, could not help but express his horror at what he saw: “Humiliated, depressed, confused ... exhausted and covered with dirty rags, they are [once] the natural owners of this land - [now ] rather ghosts of the past than living people; they vegetate here in their melancholy existence, waiting for an even more melancholy end.” Strzelecki also mentioned "the examination by one race of the corpse of another - with the verdict: "She died overtaken by the punishment of God." The extermination of the natives could be regarded as hunting, as a sport, because they seemed to have no soul.

True, Christian missionaries opposed the notions of the “lack of soul” among the “natives” and saved the lives of a considerable number of the last indigenous inhabitants of Australia. Nevertheless, the constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia, which was in force already in the post-war years, ordered (section 127) "not to take into account the natives" when calculating the population of individual states. Thus, the constitution denied their involvement in the human race. After all, back in 1865, Europeans, when confronted with natives, were not sure whether they were dealing with "intelligent monkeys or very lowly developed people."

Caring for "these beastmen" is "a crime against our own blood," Heinrich Himmler recalled in 1943, speaking of the Russians, who should have been subjugated to the Nordic master race.

The British, who were doing "unheard of things in colonization" in Australia (in the words of Adolf Hitler), did not need this kind of instruction. Так, одно сообщение за 1885 г. гласит: «Чтобы успокоить ниггеров, им дали нечто потрясающее. The food [which was handed out to them] was half strychnine - and no one escaped his fate ... The owner of Long Lagoon, with the help of this trick, destroyed more than a hundred blacks. “In the old days in New South Wales, it was useless to get those who invited blacks over and gave them poisoned meat the punishment they deserved.” Некий Винсент Лесина еще в 1901 г. заявил в австралийском парламенте: «Ниггер должен исчезнуть с пути развития белого человека» - так «гласит закон эволюции».«Мы не сознавали, что, убивая черных, нарушаем закон… потому что раньше это практиковалось повсеместно ”, - this was the main argument of the British, who killed twenty-eight “friendly” (i.e. peaceful) natives in 1838. Prior to this massacre on Myell Creek, all actions to exterminate the indigenous inhabitants of Australia went unpunished. Only in the second year of the reign of Queen Victoria for such a crime, as an exception, seven Englishmen (from the lower strata) were hanged.

Nevertheless, in Queensland (northern Australia) at the end of the 19th century. An innocent fun was considered to drive a whole family of “nigers” - husband, wife and children - into the water to crocodiles ... During his stay in North Queensland in 1880–1884, the Norwegian Karl Lumholz heard the following statements: “You can only shoot blacks - like it - no one else can deal with them." One of the colonists remarked that this was a "hard ... but ... necessary principle." He himself shot all the men he met on his pastures, "because they essence cattle killers, women - because they generate cattle killers, and children - because they [still] will cattle killers. They do not want to work and therefore are not good for anything but to get a bullet, ”the colonists complained to Lumholtz.

Among the Anglo-Australian farmers, the trade in native women flourished, and the English settlers hunted them in droves. One government report from 1900 notes that "these women were passed from farmer to farmer" until "they were eventually thrown out like rubbish, left to rot from venereal diseases." The government considered intermarriage "degrading for the [English] man, though these men were almost always of the lowest birth." But the strongest argument against this kind of connection was the "birth of hybrids." Women should be "kept in complete isolation to prevent this evil". This position was given some scientism by the publication of books such as The Science of Man (1907), which "explained": such crosses usually degenerate and die out.

“The cattle farming project in northern Australia has for the first time created a serious threat to the existence of local tribes. To crush their resistance, punitive police expeditions slaughtered entire tribes,” Roberts wrote.

One of the last documented Aboriginal massacres in the Northwest took place in 1928. A missionary witnessed this massacre and decided to look into Aboriginal reports of incessant killings. He followed a police squad heading to the Forest River Aboriginal Reservation and saw that the policemen had captured an entire tribe. The prisoners were shackled, building the back of the head to the back of the head, and then all but three women were killed. After that, they burned the corpses, and took the women with them to the camp. Before leaving the camp, they also killed and burned these women.

The evidence collected by this missionary eventually led the authorities to open an investigation, which was carried out by a "Royal Commission into the Murder and Burning of Aborigines in the East Kimberley and the methods used by the police in their arrests" (1928. West Australian Parliamentary Papers. Vol. 1. P . 10.). However, the police officers responsible for the incident have never been brought to justice.

One Melbourne newspaper described the following statement as typical of that time: "If the government announced the hunting season for blacks tomorrow, I would be the first to apply for a license." Other "whites" "were in full solidarity with this statement." Аборигенов все еще называют «ниггерами» и «ублюдками». "Unlimited hatred is common here."

In another part of Australia, the following comment appeared: Aboriginal people "under the black law within a radius of 100 miles from Adelaide should be put in boxes and sent to CSIRO government laboratories to be used in experiments instead of rats." This statement is said to have come from a Port Adelaide City Councilor in September 1977.

In any case, in the XIX century. none of the London governments issued any special laws to protect the indigenous inhabitants of Australia - and did not even try to do so (unlike the Madrid government, which issued similar laws back in the 16th century, and the Muscovite - in the 17th century). And none of the British governments took it upon themselves to protect the natives, or even felt obliged to do so. Unless lone humanists listened to the rhetorical statements of the opposition (in particular, to the conclusions of the London parliamentary commission of inquiry into the events of 1837, which reported on "unprecedented atrocities", by the way, Gladstone was a member of this commission). But individual indignant voices had no effect on the British colonists. After Australia received the status of a self-governing dominion (1855/1856), the indignant calls of private humanist unions (which were once ridiculed by Thomas Carlyle, and which were later attacked by the British fascists) from the mother country finally ceased to oblige anyone to anything. (По сути, и рабочий класс, и истеблишмент воспринимали «Humanitarian League» как «протестантское занудство». Ибо как раз неквалифицированные европейцы, опасаясь конкуренции аборигенов, отказывались признавать равенство «ниггеров», в том числе и в Австралии. Англосаксонские плохо квалифицированные рабочие издевались over the natives, thereby asserting his racial "superiority.") British administrator Richard Bligh unsuccessfully tried to protect native women and children. In 1849 he reported on the atrocities committed by their murderers. После этого все английское колониальное сообщество отвернулось от него - так поступали с каждым, кто пытался защищать «ниггеров».) Как писал Кирнан, протесты из Лондона игнорировались колонистами, а дарование Австралии в 1855/1856 г. автономии вообще положило им конец. After they are hunted for skulls - to exchange with wild tribes.

When the planters in Queensland could no longer count on British hard laborers, the Melanesians (1860s) were hunted down and enslaved by the North Australian colonists. For this, in 1872, the Anglican Bishop of Melanesia, John Patteson, was killed. Only such a high-profile event was able to draw the attention of the British Parliament to the problem of atrocities in northern Australia, forcing it to take appropriate action. However, many years passed before these measures brought any practical results. After all, such revelations have always been drowned out by the voices of interested parties.

In general, it was Australia (and above all Tasmania) that was the region in which the "racial instincts", the "healthy national feeling" of the English colonists were shamelessly directed against the most defenseless of all human beings - and all this happened in not so ancient times. Shamelessly also in the sense that the crimes committed were not required to be hidden from the "population" - after all, the "population" of Australia was itself thoroughly saturated with racial "popular feeling". In Australia, there was no need for a secret state machine of extermination - all the atrocities were committed in broad daylight. English settlers operated openly across the wide expanses of the interior of the continent - driven by the force that both Houston Stewart Chamberlain and Adolf Hitler preferred to intelligence: instinct. The colonists did not receive direct instructions from London to exterminate the natives, but it cannot be said that none of the British thinkers "blessed" them. For example, Benjamin Kidd stated: "The instincts of the masses have a deeper scientific basis than the intellect of educated people." (Kydd categorically stated that "slavery is the most natural and ... one of the most reasonable institutions"). And the so progressive Herbert George Wells (in 1902 and 1904) painted a picture of the future, where "crowds of black, brown and yellow peoples who do not meet the requirements of efficiency" must "give way": "Their fate is extinction and extinction." For, after all, "the world is not a charitable institution." From which, again, the conclusion was drawn: "the only reasonable and logical solution in relation to the lower race is its destruction." Such a project went beyond what Adolf Hitler managed to put into practice (although Rauschning argued that the latter had the potential to carry out acts of genocide on an even larger scale).

During the period when Hitler's views were just being formed, the opinion that the "primitive" (and therefore "lower") races were destined to be forced out and even exterminated became widespread (precisely under the influence of Hitler's English predecessors). “After all, progress should have been paid for - if possible at someone else's expense ...”, and not at the expense of the carriers of progress themselves. In addition, Karl Peters assured that the imperialist policy of colonization "improved the condition of the workers." In 1907, he told the Germans that the development of overseas territories depended directly on the displacement of local residents, as, for example, in North America and Australia. And Hans Grimm, on the eve of the Second World War, in the spirit of his Fuhrer, tried to remind the British that the tasks facing the white race - the British and the Germans - are of paramount importance for all mankind.

And it was Australia, a country so devoted to the cause of the white race and English racism, that in 1919 the part of New Guinea, captured by the German Reich, was transferred as a "mandatory territory". As a result, the region where German domination left a good memory of itself in the memory of the “natives” (unlike the African colonies) fell under the rule of an extremely racist Australia. In New Guinea, German colonization is remembered as a "golden age" - especially when compared to the rule of the new colonial masters, whose "[racist! cruelty ... so vividly imprinted in the memory. Under the Australian occupation - unlike the German one - sexual contact between locals and Europeans was regarded as a criminal offence. But in many German colonies in the South Seas - in contrast to the English colonies - cohabitation with natives has become almost the rule. Living examples of the symbiosis of cultures in the German Pacific territories before their Anglicization were the children born from such ties.

Even the Germans, who held high positions in the overseas colonial administration, married natives. So, in the German part of New Guinea, before the Australian occupation (which began during the First World War), one “native”, Samoan, nicknamed “Queen Emma”, literally held in her hands “the keys to high colonial society”. Yes, quite a few Germans from the southern seas, in appearance and in their way of life, in their specifically “Pacific” manner of behavior, over time became more and more like natives. This similarity was so obvious that the Secretary of State for the Colonies, Wilhelm Solf, under the impression of the British racist practice of apartheid in Calcutta, felt obliged to warn the Germans against a possible "turning into Kanaks." In the end, this German admirer of the British colonial order achieved a ban on marriages between Europeans and natives in the German colonies (though only in 1912 - two years before the loss of these possessions). The last German Kaiser (under the influence of the English prophet of racism and later Hitler's mastermind, Chamberlain) approved this racist ban on mixed marriages against the will of the majority of the Reichstag (Social Democrats, the Catholic Center Party and free-thinking deputies). However, mixed couples in the German territories in the South Seas did not even think of parting. If anyone has suffered from the spontaneous reaction of the population to this ban, it is the propagandists of racism themselves. When one member of the Union for Racial Hygiene (who took inspiration from following English models) in the German part of Samoa tried to agitate for "racial purity", "a storm of indignation arose". In the end, the German colonial administration was forced to detain this man for his own safety. And only when the "racially conscious" German was sent to his homeland, the situation stabilized.

Before the occupation of the German part of New Guinea by Australians of British origin, there were no laws on racial purity in this territory. The Australian Anglo-Saxons, who created the laws on races, "accomplished the unheard of in the matter of colonization" - this is how Adolf Hitler spoke of their deeds. It was an "unheard of" genocide of the local population in order to free up living spaces for the "master race". This example was so impressive that, perhaps, it was he - rather than the events in North America - that could serve as a precedent for the development by Hitler ("a German sword for a German plow") of "spaces in the East", serve as a model for the Germanization of lands - after the genocide and the reduction of the remaining inhabitants to the status of "subhuman".